Which assessment provides insights into a child's view of their comprehension but depends on the child's judgments and has questionable validity and reliability?

Which assessment provides insights into a child's view of their comprehension but depends on the child's judgments and has questionable validity and reliability?

• A. Lexiles
• B. 5 concepts of print
• C. Self-evaluation checklists (e.g., When I read I...)
• D. Informal reading inventories (passages & questions)

Answer: (D)

Understanding how a reader views their own comprehension is a metacognitive check: it asks the student to reflect on what they understood and what strategies they used. The best fit here is self-evaluation checklists, because they invite the child to judge their own understanding and awareness during reading. However, because these judgments come from the student, they can be influenced by bias, confidence, or misperception, making their validity and reliability more questionable than hands-on performance measures. Contrast this with other options: Lexiles estimate text complexity and reader level, not the student’s inner sense of understanding. Five concepts of print are about early print awareness and conventions, not about comprehension judgments. Informal reading inventories use passages followed by questions to determine actual comprehension skills and other reading abilities through demonstrated performance, rather than the student’s self-assessment of understanding.

Understanding how a reader views their own comprehension is a metacognitive check: it asks the student to reflect on what they understood and what strategies they used. The best fit here is self-evaluation checklists, because they invite the child to judge their own understanding and awareness during reading. However, because these judgments come from the student, they can be influenced by bias, confidence, or misperception, making their validity and reliability more questionable than hands-on performance measures.

Contrast this with other options: Lexiles estimate text complexity and reader level, not the student’s inner sense of understanding. Five concepts of print are about early print awareness and conventions, not about comprehension judgments. Informal reading inventories use passages followed by questions to determine actual comprehension skills and other reading abilities through demonstrated performance, rather than the student’s self-assessment of understanding.